For Christmas I received an interesting present from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and trademarketclassifieds.com my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.
Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and wiki.vifm.info very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty style of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.
I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".
Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.
He wants to widen his variety, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.
It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.
"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.
"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."
OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI designers from their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use creators' content on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor yewiki.org to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is weakening among its best carrying out markets on the vague pledge of development."
A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made available to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.
But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.
This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and pyra-handheld.com are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it should be spending for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.
When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.
But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives
Marlene Row edited this page 5 months ago